Friday, April 24, 2015

Portfolio Analysis



Portfolios

a.     Name of Photographer: Travis Haughton
b.     General focus of portfolio: Journalism
c.      List 3 problems that the judges noted: Some pictures needed captions, the angle for some pictures were wrong, the angle is too tight for a lot of them; get a wider frame
d.     List 2 things the judges like: The angle of the basketball picture was good but too small, different levels going on in the picture
e.     What is your overall impression of the photographer: I think he has a different way of taking pictures that is nice, but he needs some more practice in lighting and the angles at which he takes his pictures.

f.      Name of Photographer: Josh Birnbaum
g.     General focus of portfolio: Sports
h.     List 3 problems that the judges noted: Get better angles & better timing, wait for the moment or edit the moment, pace your pictures throughout your portfolio
i.       List 2 things the judges like: The content makes the picture amusing, the photographer gets in with the action
j.       What is your overall impression of the photographer: I think he has some really great ideas and some amazing detail shots throughout his portfolio, but he could work on his technique and the way he works with the subjects.

k.     Name of Photographer: Justin Mott
l.       General focus of portfolio: Sports
m.   List 3 problems that the judges noted: Expand past some of the same things you have taken pictures of, where’s the subject ? , make point of picture more obvious
n.     List 2 things the judges like: The color and light and angle are all very good, definitely waited for the right moment.
o.     What is your over all impression of the photographer: The pictures were amazing. I loved this photographer, but there were a few terrible pictures that did not belong in the portfolio.  The story at the end made me want to fall asleep.


Winning Portfolio (Dustin Snipes/Sports)

a.     What did judges note as strengths : color & composition, streamline of swimmers makes content interesting, photographer gets into the subjects of the picture, POV of the pictures are very good, chaos of the picture somehow looks good, blur of the picture adds to the detail of the subject, even with a little set up, the creativity is very good, photographer really got up close and personal with the subjects to make sure they got a really good pictures.

b.     What do you see as strengths: This photographer is very good. He knows what he’s doing with composition, angle and editing along with the initial lighting of the photos. I loved his portfolio, and he had to have had a lot of creativity and a lot of vision to get this quality of pictures.


Contest recap vid

Describe process for choosing winner:
Decides who has the worst pictures, narrows down and takes out all of the portfolios with weak compositions, “reward diversity”, look at editing of pictures as well as composition of each, decide winner.


PART 2


I agree with the judges on the Action Category picture of the runners. The photographer should have cropped it.


I disagree with their judgment of the football shot in the No Pro / No College category. They thought that the ball got lost in the running players and that the photographer should have cropped the picture more to make the focus on the ball and the hands of the players, but I think that the ball brings the focus to the top of the picture by itself without having to crop out half of some of the players’ bodies. I think the composition was good.

No comments:

Post a Comment